<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProfitBiz Blog &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.profits4sure.com/blog/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.profits4sure.com/blog</link>
	<description>The Home Business Viewpoint</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are Spam Blockers Too Strict?</title>
		<link>http://www.profits4sure.com/blog/2008/03/are-spam-blockers-too-strict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.profits4sure.com/blog/2008/03/are-spam-blockers-too-strict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iHomeBiz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO and Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam blockers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spammers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.profits4sure.com/blog/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America Online’s controversial plan to charge mass e-mailers a fee to bypass their anti-spam system highlights the other, lesser-known, horn of the junk-e-mail problem: Filters that allegedly work too well. At issue is the problem of “false positives,” industry-speak for legitimate messages mistakenly filtered out by anti-spam software. “If AOL or another ISP decides that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.profits4sure.com/blog/2008/03/are-spam-blockers-too-strict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
